FANDOM


WikiProject United States (Rated #redirect wikipedia:Template:WikiProject United States/class-class)
90pxThis template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. </td></tr>
Symbol question.svg [[:Category:
  1. redirect wikipedia:Template:WikiProject United States/class-Class United States articles|
  2. redirect wikipedia:Template:WikiProject United States/class]] </td>
This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.</td></tr>[[Category:
  1. redirect wikipedia:Template:WikiProject United States/class-Class United States articles]][[Category:
  2. redirect wikipedia:Template:WikiProject United States/class-Class United States articles of NA-importance]]
 
</td></tr></table></td>
</td>

</tr></table>

WikiProject Sports  
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
 

Removed "Winged Helmets"Edit

Removed "winged helmets" as part of the equipment since they do not differ from regular helmets in any way but the paint. Violates neutrality by promoting one (major) teams helmet over others. 75.185.5.127 (talk)

Nose guard or Nose tackle Edit

I just merged Nose tackle into Nose guard while cleaning up the merge backlog. This template links to Nose Tackle, which is now a redirect to Nose guard. Not sure if it would be best to change the template or the name of the Nose Guard article. AIRcorn (talk) 07:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Plans for American Football ArticlesEdit

I am working on the templates for American football, please be patient while I try to streamline the football article organization. Thanks VictorianMutant (talk) 04:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

It's probably better to discuss your changes first. You can work on the template in your userspace, then present it for discussion as a finished work. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay, started the discussion here. VictorianMutant (talk) 07:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Formation types Edit

Just curious how many different articles are there on formation types, because that could be a separate section unto itself. DandyDan2007 (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.