Template talk:SEC Football Legends navbox

Legend?
Just curious--what does it take to qualify to be a "legend" as opposed to someone who was just really great?--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm similarly confused about what qualifies one to be included in this template. Without clear, documented criteria for inclusion, then I don't know how this can be defended as encyclopedic. Unless someone cares to respond with a cogent argument for the value of this template, then I intend to submit a deletion request. &mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I've been waiting, I'll go ahead and propose for deletion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Scratch that there's a list at SEC Football Legends and it looks like it's an actual award that is documented and sourced. Looks silly to me, but silly isn't a reason to delete.  I'll back off now... it might not be "notable" though...--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops, I guess I should have noticed that as well (since it is linked from the template). I imagine this award is at least as "notable" as some other things included on WP, so I'm not going to pursue it. &mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 17:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)